Talk:Equippables Database - Revision history

Defosage: /* 2 things */

2010-12-14T21:11:29Z

‎2 things

2010-12-14T21:09:27Z

‎2 things

2010-12-14T21:09:11Z

‎2 things: new section

2010-08-09T10:05:47Z

2010-08-07T19:57:54Z

Reverted edits by Pascal (Talk) to last revision by CHiNback

2010-08-07T19:57:38Z

Reverted edits by CHiNback (Talk) to last revision by Pascal

2010-08-07T19:56:55Z

2010-08-07T03:10:05Z

2010-08-07T02:51:51Z

2010-08-07T02:44:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 14 December 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	> Pascal recently mentioned to me the idea of adding images for each item (not too big, obviously). Would this be a good thing to go ahead with?		> Pascal recently mentioned to me the idea of adding images for each item (not too big, obviously). Would this be a good thing to go ahead with?

−	>Possibly adding an 'Upgrades' section? It'd be nice to have everything all on one page, and upgrades are technically equippables. I was playing around with basic layouts/necessary information on the sandbox page.	+	>Possibly adding an 'Upgrades' section? It'd be nice to have everything all on one page, and upgrades are technically equippables. I was playing around with basic layouts/necessary information on the sandbox page.--[[User:Defosage\|Defosage]] 16:11, 14 December 2010 (EST)

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 st, this would be way to much work, which I currently don't have, 2nd I don't have a clue of what is going to look like, before I even would do something like this I would to see what will be the difference. So I won't allow until I see a really good example :P --[[User:Pascal|Pascal]] 10:05, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 > Pascal recently mentioned to me the idea of adding images for each item (not too big, obviously).  Would this be a good thing to go ahead with?
 >Possibly adding an 'Upgrades' section?  It'd be nice to have everything all on one page, and upgrades are technically equippables.  I was playing around with basic layouts/necessary information on the sandbox page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 14 December 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	1st, this would be way to much work, which I currently don't have, 2nd I don't have a clue of what is going to look like, before I even would do something like this I would to see what will be the difference. So I won't allow until I see a really good example :P --[[User:Pascal\|Pascal]] 10:05, 9 August 2010 (UTC)		1st, this would be way to much work, which I currently don't have, 2nd I don't have a clue of what is going to look like, before I even would do something like this I would to see what will be the difference. So I won't allow until I see a really good example :P --[[User:Pascal\|Pascal]] 10:05, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== 2 things ==
		+
		+	> Pascal recently mentioned to me the idea of adding images for each item (not too big, obviously). Would this be a good thing to go ahead with?
		+
		+	>Possibly adding an 'Upgrades' section? It'd be nice to have everything all on one page, and upgrades are technically equippables. I was playing around with basic layouts/necessary information on the sandbox page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 9 August 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:

	<span style="color:#ff0">Then would it be necessary to add an anchor to each item on the page (if that's possible)?</span>{{User:CHiNback/Sig}}		<span style="color:#ff0">Then would it be necessary to add an anchor to each item on the page (if that's possible)?</span>{{User:CHiNback/Sig}}
		+
		+	1st, this would be way to much work, which I currently don't have, 2nd I don't have a clue of what is going to look like, before I even would do something like this I would to see what will be the difference. So I won't allow until I see a really good example :P --[[User:Pascal\|Pascal]] 10:05, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 7 August 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I agree with Scott here, it works fine as it is, and it's way to much hassle to add 200 pages if it gives no difference for the users XD. --[[User:Pascal\|Pascal]] 03:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		I agree with Scott here, it works fine as it is, and it's way to much hassle to add 200 pages if it gives no difference for the users XD. --[[User:Pascal\|Pascal]] 03:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	<span style="color:#ff0">Then would it be necessary to add an anchor to each item on the page (if that's possible)?</span>{{User:CHiNback/Sig}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 7 August 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I agree with Scott here, it works fine as it is, and it's way to much hassle to add 200 pages if it gives no difference for the users XD. --[[User:Pascal\|Pascal]] 03:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		I agree with Scott here, it works fine as it is, and it's way to much hassle to add 200 pages if it gives no difference for the users XD. --[[User:Pascal\|Pascal]] 03:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	<span style="color:#ff0">Then would it be necessary to add an anchor to each item on the page (if that's possible)?</span>{{User:CHiNback/Sig}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:10, 7 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Most Players can't find the pages they're on anyway I mean it would be easier redirecting each item to the page instead of breaking up the page :P --[[User:Scott\|Scott]] 02:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		Most Players can't find the pages they're on anyway I mean it would be easier redirecting each item to the page instead of breaking up the page :P --[[User:Scott\|Scott]] 02:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	I agree with Scott here, it works fine as it is, and it's way to much hassle to add 200 pages if it gives no difference for the users XD. --[[User:Pascal\|Pascal]] 03:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 7 August 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	<span style="color:#ff0">An advantage to this would be so that players could directly search the item instead of being directed to this page or the [[Hunting]] page, for example.</span>{{User:CHiNback/Sig}}		<span style="color:#ff0">An advantage to this would be so that players could directly search the item instead of being directed to this page or the [[Hunting]] page, for example.</span>{{User:CHiNback/Sig}}
		+
		+
		+	Most Players can't find the pages they're on anyway I mean it would be easier redirecting each item to the page instead of breaking up the page :P --[[User:Scott\|Scott]] 02:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 7 August 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Yeah it is a good idea but we'd end up with 200+ pages :/ with an image and small description. Templates are easy I know :) Nice Wiki sig also :P I had one on wikia but i'm fine with having a normal one for now :) --[[User:Scott\|Scott]] 02:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		Yeah it is a good idea but we'd end up with 200+ pages :/ with an image and small description. Templates are easy I know :) Nice Wiki sig also :P I had one on wikia but i'm fine with having a normal one for now :) --[[User:Scott\|Scott]] 02:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	<span style="color:#ff0">An advantage to this would be so that players could directly search the item instead of being directed to this page or the [[Hunting]] page, for example.</span>{{User:CHiNback/Sig}}